When Using Coaching as a Leadership Development Tool

The Impact of Leadership Development Using Coaching

---

Organizational leaders must exist clear about the value different leadership development options afford and the likely impact of each. Equally such, this paper will address iii different leadership development options— cocky-directed, management-prompted, and coaching and and then specify the probable render on investment organizational leaders can expect. In addition, it volition go into greater detail regarding how leadership development programs that include coaching bring value to the individual and the arrangement, provided organizations are gear up to align their program with business strategies, human resource initiatives, and client commitment.

---

Corporations, both in the United States (U.s.) and abroad are recognizing that leaders are instrumental in managing change, innovating, and buffering the effects of environmental forces. Such leaders must possess idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual finesse, and an ability to connect immediate tasks to a larger vision. With such a list of demanding attributes and abilities organizations are certain to have a hard time finding and attracting these leaders.

Combine this list with talent pools that are shrinking in the areas of math, engineering, technology, and science and organizational leaders will discover that they must practise more than simply better their hiring practices (Rothwell, 2010). Even equally they begin to focus on employee retention using inclusion techniques, communicating a welcoming corporate culture, and offering a better benefits package, organizations will struggle to match existing talent with their needs (CSRA, 2018). Many industry giants like Chick-fila, Campbell’s Soup, Booz Allan Hamilton, UPS, and Whirlpool have already undertaken measures to develop their talent in-firm, thereby signifying a major shift regarding what is needed to sustain a business.

Methods organizational leaders can utilize to develop their people include self-management, direction-prompted, and coaching. Leave a person to self-instruct and but so much volition happen. Add a trainer or mentor as part of an employee’s almanac performance review and the private is likely to achieve more than. Engage a client with a leadership coach and transformation becomes more than probable (Stoltzfus, 2005).

Yet, Shelton (2012) found coaching needed to be nested with a larger organizational program. The all-time leadership programs were those that used effective designs, engaged a diverse audition, and allowed for varied admission and delivery (Shelton, 2012). Other experts have contended that at some point these programs must leap a generalized training approach to a context-specific one (Alan & Whybrow, 2008). With different options to consider, leaders must be articulate about the value each leadership option offers and its bear upon. Equally such, this paper will address iii different options— self-directed, management-prompted, and coaching and and then specify the likely return on investment organizational leaders tin expect.

What Should an Organization Promise to Achieve?

Leadership development is intended to close the gap betwixt what leaders already know and what they need to know (VanVelsor, McCauley, & Ruderman, 2010). Collins (2002) highlighted that development requires a whole-person arroyo; and, Anderson and Anderson (2005) brought forward that evolution must occur within an organizational context. Summarily, development then includes skill, grapheme, comportment, and inner personal alignment, in addition to leader-organizational alignment. Whereas employees enter the organization with varying levels of skill, experience, and character evolution, organizational leaders must determine to what extent they will enable their followers to abound and develop and how other business decisions will impact their leadership development initiatives.

Cocky-Directed Development

Many organizations employ a
laissez-faire
approach to leader and follower evolution. Employees are shown where to discover corporate policies, benefits information (e.g., education reimbursement), online tutorials, and in some instances access to corporate “universities” (CSRA, 2017). Many of these corporate universities contain books, articles, and learning videos. Skillport from Skillsoft (2016), an didactics vendor, provides organizations a deject-based repository of content, expertly produced to fit a specific audience’south attending and interest. They evangelize the data using brusk videos and address topics to help the viewer improve communication, manage confrontation, and develop listening skills (Skillsoft, 2016). Challenges associated with this approach include:

• Followers not thinking they demand to develop, equally they frequently believe their current skills and position validate their competency (Skillsoft, 2016).
• Followers focusing on self-interest topics only. • Sources of information not adjustment with corporate values, strategies, or objectives (Anderson & Anderson, 2005).
• An inability to ensure what employees larn and retain (Hunt & Weintraub, 2007).

Learning theories fence one must blot, process, retain, and utilize information as part of the learning process. Palmer and Whybrow (2008) proffered that learning is comprised of one’s cognitive, emotional, and experiential make-up and that one’southward social and cultural identity influence the estimation of new information. Information technology is these aspects that impact how ane translates information into usable knowledge and its application; thus, it is possible that followers who participate in selfdirected pedagogy may not grasp all the learning points accurately.

Organizational leaders that employe this approach, are likely to off-white better than organizations that exercise not offer any leadership development options. Anderson and Anderson (2005) would suggest such an approach is not probable to proffer a measurable business organization touch. Meaning, what leaders currently observe or experience in the workforce regarding productivity, teamwork, and internal and external client satisfaction, is the total extent that this passive cocky-directed evolution method will produce.

Management-Prompted Development

Organizations that utilize a management-prompted approach will likely feel varied results. Applications of this method include people managers prompting their followers to brand use of existing educational benefits to obtain skill-based credentials; reach more advanced educational degrees with the hope of securing future promotions; and, engage in cursory mentoring relationships to acquire more than about a specific knowledge area. In a manner, the mentoring approach is similar to what Hunt and Weintraub (2007) called “developmental coaching” every bit “the leader exists to increase the individual’s ability to perform a particular work part (or task)” (Chase & Weintraub, 2007, p. 34). Stoltzfus (2005), similarly divers this type of interaction, as a method of pedagogy based on a mentor’south feel merely.

Whereas management-prompted development may offer more of an opportunity for a follower to learn than the self-directed method, typically the learning is oriented toward achieving a skill. What is missing is the interaction one needs to generate self-sensation, which according to Perls (1969) is vital for retaining and applying new information (Perls, 1969).

As previously stated, this approach is probable to proffer better results at the technical level, as it enables people to enact concern processes more than accurately or with greater proficiency specific to the technical skill or knowledge surface area. What is unknown is the extent to which this arroyo imparts real business organisation value; significant, the value in terms of gaining client trust, offering repeatable quality to clients, and enhancing employee retention.

Leadership Development Using Coaching

Whereas the self-directed and management-prompted approaches are of some do good, leadership coaching is more than likely to translate into measurable forms of business organization value. Anderson and Anderson (2005) contended that coaching encourages clients to deepen their insights and translate those insights into action. According to Collins (2002), Palmer and Whybrow (2008), and Chase and Weintraub (2007), coaching holds the promise of transformation, as it is the just method that inclines one to grow beyond surface issues. This is possibly due to what Lewis-Duarte (2012) found, describing how executive coaches use specific tactics to gain customer commitment that changes behavior. These tactics included “gaining initial influence via consultation, the use of coalition tactics, inspirational appeals, and rational persuasion” (Lewis-Duarte, 2012, p. 255). Thus, by being in a coaching human relationship, leaders can address their specific evolution needs and larn through the coaching feel regarding how to gain similar commitment from their followers.

Although coaching is believed to be the most constructive form of leadership development, organizational leaders seeking to utilize this method must found appropriate expectations regarding what it can accomplish. For example, individual coaching programs are comprised of formal assessments, challenges, and support (VanVelsor, Mccauley, & Ruderman, 2010); but, they are not always connected to a challenging assignment, which is where the individual would apply their new-found leadership practice. In addition, some coaching programs may not be aligned with organizational strategies, thereby resulting in a direct do good to the individual, just, non the system.

Anderson and Anderson (2005) suggested leadership programs that translate coaching benefits into organizational value are those that emanate a “coaching civilization” where anybody is in a preferred state of growing and developing. They suggested such a civilisation will not only help followers transform their insights into action, only will

• Increase productivity
• Improve teamwork
• Increase squad member satisfaction
• Increment client satisfaction

Although leadership development within an organization helps anybody, many organizational leaders all the same retain an expectation mismatch. They believe coaching on its own will increase business organisation development, retain talent, advance promotions, and increase diversity (Anderson & Anderson, 2005). Although these aspects are possible, such is not the instance for all who engage in leadership coaching (Anderson & Anderson, 2005).

What is known, is that inside the coaching-client relationship, clients develop in relation to the level of trust they perceive they take with their passenger vehicle. Florin (2015) proposed as the coaching relationship moves from a task-role orientation toward a goal-action-results orientation and and so an accountability orientation, leaders experienced a convergence betwixt ideas, values, and responses making transformation possible. This is because, as Stainer (2016) contended, inside the coaching context, the client experiences powerful questions, introspection, increased readiness, and needed infinite to re-frame their perspective. Still, it is possible for organizational leaders to get the incorrect impression regarding how coaching can serve them. Meaning, one might recollect that “every bit a client learns new skills, such as a way of approaching challenges, and, merges this with an internal practice of knowing how to learn, an private can cocky-reflect and proceeds meaningful insight without a double-decker” (Anderson & Anderson, 2005, p. xviii). Although this is possible, nearly individuals will not probable push button themselves, or dig deep, nor exercise they naturally continue to notice means to improve.

Leadership Evolution Programs

Hunt and Weintraub (2007) constitute the best leadership coaching experiences were those that were part of a broader development program. Such programs, as specified by Anderson and Anderson (2005) were those where

• Companies had dedicated staff to back up coaching initiatives.
• Coaching was linked to the organisation’s business strategies, man resource policies, and benefits package.
• Coaching was integrated with other leadership development approaches.
• Coaches were external to the organisation to maintain confidence and reduce vulnerability.
• Individuals desired to change and were committed to the client-coach relationship.

When leadership coaching existed inside this context both the individual and organization benefited (Anderson & Anderson, 2005).

What is rarely considered is the value that coaching produces as customer’s progress through the four stages of organizational coaching—Phase I gaining personal centeredness, Stage Ii building interpersonal and resilient relationships, Phase III creating alignment among teams, groups, or networks, and Phase Iv enabling change at the individual and system-broad levels (Anderson & Anderson, 2005). See Figure i.

Anderson and Anderson (2005) reported, for organizations that helped their leaders gain personal and professional person focus there was a “$iv.4K” return (Anderson & Anderson, 2005, p. 263). For leaders that developed an ability to build constructive interpersonal relationships, a “$51.5K” was possible (Anderson & Anderson, 2005, p. 263). Leaders that were able to create alignment with internal and external stakeholders resulted in a “$83.5K” return and leaders that were able to generate change proffered a “$138.3K” render (Anderson & Anderson, 2005, p. 263).

Berg (2013) clarified the value of coaching by reporting what happens when leaders do not possess these abilities, specifically when they are in project manager positions. He contended for project managers that perceived their work experience equally meaningful, this type of work provided an opportunity to learn continually, adapt, and find solutions (Berg, 2012). For those that perceived their position as likewise demanding, challenging, difficult, and stressful, often project tasks went unfulfilled. The effect of which included a lack of client trust, diminished internal and external relationships, and minimal follow-on work.

Crane (2002) farther defined the impact identifying the traits of a loftier-operation coaching-culture. He proffered, such cultures were “where people of character lived out their values within an organization that was aligned to accomplish their mission” (Crane, 2002, p. 195). Such cultures were those where (Crane, 2002, p. 195-196) Stage I Achieving Personal Centeredness Stage Two Edifice Interpersonal & Resilient Relationships Phase Three Achieving Alignment Amidst Stakeholders Stage IV Enabling Change

• Everyone in the system knew the direction the arrangement was moving.
• Team members demonstrated a high sense of delivery to the organisation, the team, and 1 another. • Communication among team members was extremely effective, promoting learning and frontwards activeness.
• The grapheme of the organisation was evidenced past follower behaviors that were congruent with the system’s shared values.
• The arrangement and the individuals in information technology were open to and comfortable with change.
• A spirit of collaboration existed amidst the arrangement’south members.
• And coaching-like behavior was proficient up, down, and beyond the organization.

These traits translate into an organization’south ability to develop an internal directional system, a type of “internal gyroscope” that helped the organization’s people navigate through difficult circumstances (Crane, 2002, p. 196). Not only were goals and objectives clear, doable, and well-coordinated; but, followers were able to report both success and failure (Crane, 2002).

The Tangible Benefits of Leadership Coaching

Leaders willing to nest coaching within a larger organizational development program should as well be enlightened of the direct, tangible benefits associated with leadership coaching. These benefits include just are non express to helping leaders develop emotional intelligence, establishing articulate professional goals, and experimenting with new leadership practices when trying to constitute change.

Coaching Helps Develop Emotional Intelligence

Considering organizational leaders gain more value when followers develop an ability to build interpersonal and resilient relationships (Stage II), Goleman (2008) proffered this is because truly constructive leaders are those that possess a high degree of emotional intelligence. He defined emotional intelligence every bit being comprised of (1) self-awareness (i.e., understanding oneself), (2) empathy (i.eastward., understanding others), (three) self-direction (i.e., being able to reflect and employ principles to oneself), and (iv) human relationship management (i.eastward., being able to collaborate with others). Thus, leaders able to develop their emotional intelligence and utilize it to team interactions are more probable to understand situations that appear stressful and proactively take measures to cope or avoid negative outcomes. Farther, such leaders will set more realistic expectations for him or herself and the team, which will ultimately reduce stress and harmonize squad fellow member interaction (Goleman, 2008).

Coaching Inclines Clients to Establish Clearer Goals

For clients wanting to develop an ability to create alignment with internal and external stakeholders (Stage III), coaching takes on greater significance. Anderson and Anderson (2005) reported that many clients practise not naturally move toward this level, as this requires a leader to develop intuitive insight; thus, coach and leader tin constitute this as one of their professional goals. Florin (2015) opined coaches that brought together a leader’south “experiences, skills, and character within the coaching relationship prompt greater insight into the whole person, an aspect that accelerated permanent change” (Florin, 2015, p. 29). Kimsey-House, Kimsey-Business firm, Sandahl, and Whitworth, (2011) further contended this is because the coaching-client human relationship focuses on the leader’s desire for fulfillment, balance, and power to practice new approaches when faced with different challenges. They divers each as

• Fulfillment occurs when a leader aligns their decisions with their values.
• Residual occurs when a leader can prioritize actions, manage expectations, and reframe their own perspective.
• Practice occurs when the customer engages in an intentional field of study of exploring turbulence, issues, and challenges. Typically, this do includes clarifying the issue, exploring information technology, experiencing the effects of the draft conclusion, identifying additional underlying bug, and then finding a new path forrard.

The advantage of having “a safe and supportive space that allows the private to express and explore fears and anxieties, results in one’s power to codify coping strategies and skills and test new approaches” (Kimsey-House et al., 2011, p. 155). Thus, without coaching, people are only likely to get so far in coming together their goals, as individuals typically avoid exploring triggers, underlying causes, assumptions, or reactions that keep them from progressing required attributes (Kimsey-Firm et al., 2011).

Coaching Enables Transformation

To get a leader able to create change (Stage IV) means ane can identify opportunity in many different circumstances (Anderson & Anderson, 2005). Such a leader can change behavior in themselves and others by generating self-awareness, re-evaluating one’s perceptions, and then forming a new perspective when expected outcomes do not occur (Carey, Philippon, & Cummings, 2011). Vogus, Rothman, Sutcliffe, and Weick (2014) identified that highly reliable leaders are those who tin can balance loftier levels of incertitude and hope simultaneously, as this is an indicator that one has “the capability to swiftly respond to the unexpected” (Vogus et al., 2014, p. 594).

Duncan (2014) summarized Campbell Soup’s CEO Douglas Conant’s experience, describing his ability to transform a corporation that was a mess in 2001. Having worked through a personal experience of being let go from a erstwhile organization, coaching helped Conant reformulate his perspective. This ability helped him lead others. The tactics Conant employed included staying on bulletin, delivering on promises, and walking throughout the organisation every bit a method of engaging others in idea development. Regularly, Conant followed-up his walking arroyo past writing multiple personal notes, acknowledging each private’due south contribution. “With a eye that communicated others mattered, he would listen, frame, and advance the organization’due south strategies” (Duncan, 2014, n.p.). “By 2009 the company was outperforming both the S&P Nutrient Group and the S&P 500. Sales and earnings were on the upswing. Core businesses were flourishing. And employee engagement was at globe-course levels. The company now had 17 people who were enthusiastically engaged for every private who was not” (Duncan, 2014, due north.p.).

This type of change occurs because transformational leaders connect with their followers. Crane (2002) substantiated that eighty% of feedback must exist positive and 20% filled with constructive ideas for improvements, which was something Conant employed. Using coaching techniques, Conant would ask the question “How can I help?”, which was the same mode his coach interacted with him when he was at the everyman indicate in his professional life (Duncan, 2014, n.p.).

Limitations

Despite all the benefits of coaching, Anderson and Anderson (2005) reported few clients matriculate beyond Stage 2. This ways 70% of the investment embedded in Stage III and IV are never realized (Anderson & Anderson, 2005, p. 251). Also, they also found the impact of coaching on business outcomes increased as the coaching human relationship evolved. Meaning, “people who experienced the least number of hours of coaching correspondingly reported that coaching was less effective than clients who engaged in coaching for longer periods, as they reported it was tremendously effective” (Anderson & Anderson, 2005, p. 253).

As a outcome, organizational leaders must realize the success of leadership evolution programs is multifaceted. It is dependent on the alignment of organizational strategies and leadership development objectives, the use of apparent and well-matched coaches, and the level of commitment of those existence coached (Anderson & Anderson, 2005). This is because “transformation is strengthened when individuals and organizations are focused and committed to change and their reasoning is based on a noesis of how consequences volition impact behavior” (Carey, 2011, p. 51).

Telephone call to Action

Based on these findings, organizational leaders may conclude leadership evolution is comprised of a 30% – 30% – 40% relationship between organizational alignment and civilisation, apparent leadership programs and coaches, and individual customer delivery to change. Earlier establishing an organizational program, leaders should assess their organization’due south readiness. This requires determining if the existing business strategies and human resource policies marshal with the leadership development plan objectives. Chase and Weintraub (2007) provided a readiness cess specific to four areas—”culture, business, human resource, and experience with coaching” (Chase & Weintraub, 2007, p. 51-57).

Further, organizational leaders must determine the all-time leadership development approach and engage credible coaches. Whirlpool established a programme that used an external leadership coaching consultant to develop a cadre of internal organizational coaches (Hunt & Weintraub, 2007). Other entities used external leadership coaches to support those at the executive level or those preparing for this level (Rothwell, 2010). Although leadership coaches are not specifically required to have credentials, those that adhere to established standards and practices, such as the International Coaching Federation (2017) Core Competencies, are more probable to be reputable. This is considering, as Carey et al. (2011) found, the critical components of the coaching model includes—a robust understanding of the jitney-client relationship, competency with trouble identification, skills associated with goal-setting, and experience with having matriculated others through the transformation process.

Activeness Steps

i. ASSESS YOUR ORGANIZATION’S READINESS FROM A BUSINESS AND HUMAN RESOURCES PERSPECTIVE.

2. Decide THE BEST ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM APPROACH AND Engage CREDIBLE COACHES.

iii. USE A PHASED COACHING Approach AND ASSESS THE INDIVIDUAL’S Ability TO GROW AND DEVELOP Before ADVANCING TO THE Adjacent STAGE.

The final phone call to action includes assessing the individual’south level of commitment to the change process. Even though followers and the organization benefit from a Stage I level of coaching, an exponential level of growth and value occurs in Stage II, III, and IV. Different aspects of life, even so, such as projection constraints, life constraints, or one’s background or experience with coaching may present limitations. Equally such, organizational leaders may demand to assess followers that are more prepared to explore their internal states of dissonance, as this blazon of work requires a swell deal of introspection that many are not willing to undertake. Thus, organizational leaders may be best served by interviewing candidates or requesting their coaches to provide an cess regarding an individual’s coach-ability.

Summary

With different leadership development options to consider, leaders must exist clear near the value each option is likely to manifest. Organizations that offer a passive approach, using educational resources such as Skillsoft (Skillsoft, 2016), offer some benefit. Organizations that cull to build on their policies and benefits package to back up educational endeavors will probable entice people to develop their skills in their respective field. However, organizations that offer express access to coaching will proffer a ameliorate render, as followers that develop professional person focus commensurately improve their advice skills and power to work inside a team dynamic.

Because, yet, the greatest organizational value occurs when leaders develop an ability to build strong and resilient relationships, align internal and external stakeholders’ interests, and manage alter, organizational leaders should exist compelled now more than e’er to support more advanced coaching initiatives. Information technology is but within the coaching context that leaders are likely to develop these skills, due to the unique human relationship the coaching-customer human relationship offers.

Despite these outcomes, coaching on its own volition not translate to automated business value unless the leadership development program is aligned with other business organisation efforts. Organizations that choose to marshal their business strategies and man resource initiatives with their leadership development objectives are more than likely to cultivate an organizational culture that will positively bear on both the private and the arrangement. Thus, when organizational leaders employ a comprehensive leadership development approach, anybody in the organization will experience a positive render.

About the Writer

Cynthia S. Gavin is a strategist, having a various leadership groundwork in healthcare, disaster response, and U.Southward. war machine planning. Among her favorite positions, Ms. Gavin has provided strategic advisement for the U.S. Hole-and-corner Service’southward Technical Security Division, The City of New York Office of Emergency Management, and the U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center. Presently she is an advisor to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Manpower and Reserve Diplomacy Division. Ms. Gavin holds a Principal of Scientific discipline in Emergency Wellness Services Planning, Policy, and Assistants and is becoming a Doctor of Strategic Leadership at Regent University. Questions or comments regarding this article may be directed to the writer at: Cynthia Gavin at: [email protected]

References

Anderson, D. & Anderson, Thou. (2005).
Coaching That Counts Harnessing the Power of Leadership Coaching to Deliver Strategic Value. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

Berg, 1000., & Karisen, J. (2013). Managing Stress in Projects Using Coaching Leadership Tools.
Engineering Management Journal, 52-61.

Campbell Soup. (2017).
University Recruiting.
Retrieved from Cambell’s Career Centre: http://careers.campbellsoupcompany.com/university-recruiting/

Carey, W. P. (2011). Coaching Models For Leadership Development: An Integrative Review.
Journal of Leadership Studies,
51-69.

Crane, T. (2002).
The Heart of Coaching: Using Transformational Coaching To Create A Loftier-Performance Coaching Civilisation, Second Edition. San Diego: FTA Press.

CSRA. (2016, June xi).
CSRA.
Retrieved from csra.com: http://csra.com/

Duncan, R. (2014, September 18).
How Campbell’s Soup’s Old CEO Turned the Company Around.
Retrieved from Fast Company: https://www.fastcompany.com/3035830/howcampbells-soups-erstwhile-ceo-turned-the-company-around

Florin, W. (2015). Creating Alter Faster: Convergence and Transformation Acceleration.
Journal of Practical Consulting,
29-37.

Guan, M. & So, J. (2016). Influence of social identity on cocky-efficacy behavior through perceived social support: A Social Identity Theory perspective.
Communication Studies,
588-604.

Hunt, J. & Weintraub, J. (2007).
The Coaching Organization A Strategy for Developing Leaders.
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

ICF. (2017, November 11).
Core Competencies. Retrieved from International Coach Federation: https://coachfederation.org/credential/landing.cfm?ItemNumber=2206&navItemNumber =576

Kimsey-House, H., Kimsey-House, K., Sandahl, P. & Whitworth, 50. (2011).
Co-Active Coaching Changing Concern Transforming Lives, Tertiary Edition. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Lewis-Duarte, M., & Bligh, M. (2012). Agents of “influence”: exploring the usage, timing, and outcomes of executive coaching tactics.
Leadership & Organizational Development Journal,
255-282.

Palmer, Due south, & Whybrow, A. (2008).
Handbook of Coaching Psychology A Guide for Practitioners.
Eastward Sussex: Routledge.

Perls, F. (1969).
Gestalt Therapy Verbatim.
Moab: Real People Press.

Reyes Liske, J., & Holladay, C. (2016). Evaluating coaching’s effect: competencies, career mobility, and retention.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal,
936-949.

Rothwell, W. (2010).
Constructive Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within,
quaternary ed. New York: AMACOM.

Shelton, Thou. (2012).
Leadership Excellence: 2012 Leadership 500.
www.LeaderExcel.com.

Skillsoft. (2016).
Skillport Platform. Retrieved from Skillsoft: http://skillport.com/

Stanier, M. (2016). The Coaching Habit Say Less, Inquire More than & Change the Way You Lead Forever. Toronto: Box of Crayons Printing.

Stoltzfus, F. (2005).
Leadership Coaching The Disciplines, Skills and Heart of a Christian Coach.
Virginia Embankment: Tony Stoltzfus.

Vogus, T., Rothman, Northward., Sutcliffe, K. & Weick, K. (2014). The Effective foundations of loftier-reliability organizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 592-598.

Virtually Regent

Founded in 1978, Regent University is America’s premier Christian university with more than 11,000 students studying on its seventy-acre campus in Virginia Beach, Virginia, and online around the world. The university offers associate, bachelor’s, master’south, and doctoral degrees in more than than 150 areas of written report including business, communication and the arts, counseling, cybersecurity, divinity, education, government, law, leadership, nursing, healthcare, and psychology. Regent University is ranked the #1 All-time Accredited Online College in the United States (Study.com, 2020), the #one Safest College Campus in Virginia (YourLocalSecurity, 2021), and the #one Best Online Bachelor’s Plan in Virginia for ten years in a row (U.South. News & World Study, 2022). The School of Business & Leadership is a Gold Winner – Best Business organisation School and All-time MBA Program past Coastal Virginia Magazine. The school besides has earned a top-5 ranking by U.S. News & World Report for its online MBA and online graduate business (not-MBA) programs. The school offers both online and on-campus degrees including Chief of Business Assistants, G.S. in Accounting (to include CPA Exam & Licensure Rail), Thousand.S. in Business Analytics, M.A. in Organizational Leadership, MA. in Product Management, Ph.D. in Organizational Leadership, and Doc of Strategic Leadership.